Petitioner fined 25,000 for frivolity

Petitioner fined 25,000 for frivolity

Kochi: In a mischevious attempt by certain hardline anti-constitutional groups to harrass the Christians, one MS Anoop challenged the ‘constitutionality’ of Catholic Canon law.

The Kerala High Court has imposed costs of 25,000 rupees on a petitioner challenging the constitutionality of the Catholic Church’s Code of Canons and its applicability in India.

The Code of Canons is a codification of Canon Law that applies to the Eastern Catholic Churches affiliated to the Catholic Church.

The petitioner M S Anoop, a member of a political party, wanted the court to declare that the Code of Canons, which confers power upon the Vatican over properties of churches situated in India, as unconstitutional and opposed to the country’s sovereignty. He also contended that the Pope can have no say in the transaction of church properties in India.

The petitioner also wanted the court to decree that public trusts should administer church properties. Therefore, the alienation and transfer of those assets should be only in accordance with the leave of the court, obtained under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

While dismissing the petition on July 29, the Bench of Chief Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice A K Jayasankaran Nambiar observed,

“…it is necessary to observe at the outset that India is a secular country which guarantees fundamental freedom under Article 26 of the Constitution, to every religious denomination to own and acquire movable and immovable properties, provided such administration of properties is in accordance with the Indian Laws.”

SEE ALSO  Patna Diocese Celebrates tolerance, diversity on 100th Birthday

The Bench further stated that so long as the administration of the Church properties is done in accordance with Indian laws, the Court’s intervention would not be warranted, except in situations contemplated under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Even if the courts were to interfere, the High Court stated, the aggrieved would have to first approach a civil court.

It went on to observe,

“In the instant case, the litigant is not an aggrieved party who belongs to the particular denomination. Moreover, this is also not the appropriate court to raise grievance pertaining to Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court’s perception here is that motive of this PIL is extraneous and perhaps cheap publicity.”

Deprecating the misuse of the High Court in the strongest terms, the Bench went on to dismiss the PIL with costs of 25,000 rupees.

“In the light of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court and finding the Writ Petition to be a frivolous one, we deem it appropriate to dismiss the same by imposing a cost of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only), to discourage the litigant from filing such frivolous PIL in future. The cost amount shall be paid to the High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks from today, failing which, revenue recovery proceedings should be initiated against the petitioner.”

SEE ALSO  No more Anglo-Indian MLAs and MPs?

-based on media reports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.