In the wake of the Israel-Gaza conflict, social media platforms have undergone a noticeable transformation, with users reshaping their online presence to reflect the gravity of the ongoing war. A departure from the usual stream of personal moments and daily activities, feeds are now flooded with images and posts depicting the harrowing reality of the conflict, raising questions about the role and responsibility of individuals in the digital age.
Since the conflict escalated a month ago, a distinctive online battle has emerged, transcending geographical boundaries. Users are grappling with a complex mix of uncertainty, information warfare, and, as some claim, virtue signaling. This unique moment in time, as experts suggest, is unprecedented in its intensity and reach.
Pamela Rutledge, the director of the Media Psychology Research Center in Boston, pointed out the similarities to the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests but emphasized the profound impact of the Israel-Hamas war. The visceral nature of the conflict, coupled with personal connections many users have to the region, has set this moment apart.
Laila Rodenbeck, a 24-year-old consultant from New York, expressed her decision to halt the sharing of personal images, redirecting attention to the war’s stark realities. She sees this period as a critical juncture, urging individuals to move beyond viewing social media as a platform for self-expression and instead use it as a tool for raising awareness and taking meaningful action.
In India, right wing supporters of the current regime took to social media to express their solidarity with Narendra Modi’s ‘Friend’ Benjamin Netanyahu , and use the conflict for Muslim-bashing. On the other hand, liberals posted more frequently underlining the tragedy and desperation of the unfortunate civilians trapped in the conflict.
The shift is not uniform, however. Some users, like David Goldberg, a 35-year-old tech worker, have intensified their online presence to combat what they perceive as misinformation. Goldberg emphasizes the importance of presenting “verified data points” and fostering critical thinking rather than pushing people to pick sides.
However, the fear of backlash looms large for many. Some users, feeling paralyzed by the online anger and division, have opted for silence rather than risking insensitivity or the spread of inaccurate information. The dilemma of what to post and how to navigate the delicate balance between personal life and global crises is palpable.
Joe Walther, a visiting professor at Harvard University’s Institute for Rebooting Social Media, told The Washington Post that despite social media platforms encouraging users to share their thoughts, individuals are now more mindful of potential sensitivities. The fear of inadvertently causing offense has led some to refrain from sharing personal moments, birthdays, or even mundane details.
The pressure to post is not uniform, and many users, like a Chicago-based PhD student, find solace in avoiding the online discourse, particularly on sensitive topics related to the conflict. She suggests that much of what is posted seems performative and questions the authenticity of some online expressions of concern.
As this unique online moment unfolds, experts and users alike anticipate a return to a semblance of normalcy once the intensity of the conflict subsides in online conversations. However, opinions differ on whether social media will fully revert to its pre-war state. Some, like Hoekstra, a social media user, remain uncertain, grappling with the moral dilemma of returning to sharing non-war content in the face of ongoing civilian casualties.
The current state of social media reflects the broader societal struggle to balance personal expression with global crises. Users are faced with the challenge of navigating an evolving online landscape where the line between activism and virtue signaling is blurred, and the impact of every post is felt across borders. As the conflict continues, the role of social media in shaping public discourse and fostering awareness remains a subject of ongoing debate.
TO BE UPDATED